<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outbrain Recommendations are Advertisements in Disguise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://r3fresh.com/2008/06/28/outbrain-recommendations-are-advertisements-in-disguise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://r3fresh.com/2008/06/28/outbrain-recommendations-are-advertisements-in-disguise/</link>
	<description>Anything Goes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:14:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: r3fresh and Outbrain: We're All Good &#124; r3fresh.com</title>
		<link>http://r3fresh.com/2008/06/28/outbrain-recommendations-are-advertisements-in-disguise/comment-page-1/#comment-3133</link>
		<dc:creator>r3fresh and Outbrain: We're All Good &#124; r3fresh.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://r3fresh.com/?p=593#comment-3133</guid>
		<description>[...] post is an update to a previous post about Outbrain&#8217;s recommendation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post is an update to a previous post about Outbrain&#8217;s recommendation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaron Galai</title>
		<link>http://r3fresh.com/2008/06/28/outbrain-recommendations-are-advertisements-in-disguise/comment-page-1/#comment-3089</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaron Galai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://r3fresh.com/?p=593#comment-3089</guid>
		<description>Loren hi - I&#039;m the CEO of Outbrain. 

1st - you can easily control the behavior of our recommendtions through the outbrain control panel. You can choose to have recommendations stay strictly within your site and never send a link out. Please note that even when you choose this option, your posts will still show up elsewhere on our network when they are relevant. 

2nd - We do not promote any sites in any way within the recommendations. The links we provide are purely a result of the algorithms we&#039;ve developed. We constantly test improvements, but as with any algorithm - results can sometimes seem weird. The case above seems like a result for a recent algorithm enhancement we&#039;ve been testing where we try to find contextually relevant links to compliment our recommendations (I assume this showed up on a post discussing the MacBook?). 
In fact, all 3 sites in those recommendations (Engadget, Gizmodo and TUWA) are *not* carrying our widget and we have no relationship with them. We have no interest in showing them, other than the fact that our algorithm thought those are the best &#039;related&#039; links from trusted sources to show on your post.

I hope this clarification helps. We constantly strive to give your readers the best possible recommendations. I appologize if this seemed like a glitch. Again - while I wouldn&#039;t encourage it, feel free to limit the recommendations to your site only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loren hi &#8211; I&#8217;m the CEO of Outbrain. </p>
<p>1st &#8211; you can easily control the behavior of our recommendtions through the outbrain control panel. You can choose to have recommendations stay strictly within your site and never send a link out. Please note that even when you choose this option, your posts will still show up elsewhere on our network when they are relevant. </p>
<p>2nd &#8211; We do not promote any sites in any way within the recommendations. The links we provide are purely a result of the algorithms we&#8217;ve developed. We constantly test improvements, but as with any algorithm &#8211; results can sometimes seem weird. The case above seems like a result for a recent algorithm enhancement we&#8217;ve been testing where we try to find contextually relevant links to compliment our recommendations (I assume this showed up on a post discussing the MacBook?).<br />
In fact, all 3 sites in those recommendations (Engadget, Gizmodo and TUWA) are *not* carrying our widget and we have no relationship with them. We have no interest in showing them, other than the fact that our algorithm thought those are the best &#8216;related&#8217; links from trusted sources to show on your post.</p>
<p>I hope this clarification helps. We constantly strive to give your readers the best possible recommendations. I appologize if this seemed like a glitch. Again &#8211; while I wouldn&#8217;t encourage it, feel free to limit the recommendations to your site only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.411 seconds -->
