<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple needs DRM and Closed Platforms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://r3fresh.com/2007/08/31/apple-needs-drm-and-closed-platforms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://r3fresh.com/2007/08/31/apple-needs-drm-and-closed-platforms/</link>
	<description>Anything Goes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:14:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://r3fresh.com/2007/08/31/apple-needs-drm-and-closed-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://r3fresh.com/2007/08/31/apple-needs-drm-and-closed-platforms/#comment-319</guid>
		<description>The thing about Apple is that, for all the great software they make like OS X and iTunes and others, they&#039;re a hardware company at heart. Really the software and operating systems exist just so folks have something to do with their slickly-designed Apple hardware.

Which works, obviously, or I wouldn&#039;t be happily typing away from my MacBook while my iPod recharges, but you can&#039;t really get away from it.

I think all the other stuff about Apple relying on DRM makes a lot more sense when you view it from that perspective. And actually there&#039;s a lot to be said for the approach. They do some very slick integration that kinda looks like magic on the user end but in reality comes down to simply having a very predictable environment -- one designed by Apple specifically to be compatible with other Apple products.

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s even so much that they&#039;re actively rejecting the idea of interoperability with other people&#039;s products so much as they&#039;re just completely indifferent to it. If you were them, would you bother?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing about Apple is that, for all the great software they make like OS X and iTunes and others, they&#8217;re a hardware company at heart. Really the software and operating systems exist just so folks have something to do with their slickly-designed Apple hardware.</p>
<p>Which works, obviously, or I wouldn&#8217;t be happily typing away from my MacBook while my iPod recharges, but you can&#8217;t really get away from it.</p>
<p>I think all the other stuff about Apple relying on DRM makes a lot more sense when you view it from that perspective. And actually there&#8217;s a lot to be said for the approach. They do some very slick integration that kinda looks like magic on the user end but in reality comes down to simply having a very predictable environment &#8212; one designed by Apple specifically to be compatible with other Apple products.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s even so much that they&#8217;re actively rejecting the idea of interoperability with other people&#8217;s products so much as they&#8217;re just completely indifferent to it. If you were them, would you bother?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.369 seconds -->
